INGLIZ VA O’ZBEK TILLARIDA RAD ETISH MUNOSABATLARINING LINVOMADANIY VA KOGNITIV XUSUSIYATLARI

INGLIZ VA O’ZBEK TILLARIDA RAD ETISH MUNOSABATLARINING LINVOMADANIY VA KOGNITIV XUSUSIYATLARI

Авторы

  • Qobilova Nargisa Sulaymonovna Buxoro davlat universiteti PhD, dotsent
  • Barotova Nigina Sharofovna Buxoro davlat universiteti 2-bosqich magistranti

Ключевые слова:

nutqakti, rad etish, xushmuomalalik,pragmatik munosabat, lingvistik kompetentsiya

Аннотация

Muayyan harakatlarni so'zlar, ya'ni nutq harakatlari orqali amalga oshirish inson muloqotining asosidir. Nutq harakatlari bir madaniyatda yoki ikki va  undan ortiq madaniyatda bo'ladimi, suhbat boshlanganda sodir bo'ladi. Biroq, muayyan nutq aktining amalga oshirilishi turli madaniyatlarda nafaqat lingvistik shaklda, balki pragmatik kuchida ham farq qiladi. Madaniy begona bo'lgan til o'rganuvchilar o'zlarining ijtimoiy-madaniy me'yorlariga rioya qilish orqali ushbu harakatlarni bajarishga moyildirlar (Hong, 2011). Shunday qilib, ikkinchi,chet tilda pragmatik kuchdan noto'g'ri foydalanish ona tilida so'zlashuvchilar tomonidan noto'g'ri tushunilishi va hatto aloqaning buzilishiga olib kelishi mumkin.

Библиографические ссылки

Kobilova Nargisa Suleymanovna Literary Psychology And Style. Theoretical & Applied Science Учредители: Теоретическая и прикладная наука ISSN: 2308-4944eISSN: 2409- 0085 https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41328882

Sulaymonbekovna Q. N., Sharofovna B. N. Ways of Expressing Refusals in Speech Acts //International Journal on Integrated Education. – Т. 5. – №. 5. – С. 259-262.

Saidova. M. "SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF LITERARY TERMS BY LITERARY TYPES IN “THE CONCISE OXFORD DICTIONARY OF LITERATURE TERMS”, Philology Matters: Article 11. DOI: 10.36078/987654486 Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/philolm/vol2021/iss1/11

Расулов,З.И. (2010). Принцип контекстуального анализа эллиптических предложений (на материале английского языка). Вестник Челябинского государственного университета, (21), 91-94. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsip-kontekstualnogo-analiza-ellipticheskih-predlozheniy-na-materiale-angliyskogo-yazyka/viewer

Kobilova, N. S. (2018). BENEFITS OF USING SONGS IN TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES TO YOUNG LEARNERS. Инновационные подходы в современной науке https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35081671

Saidovna, V. F. (2022). The Usage of Pilgrimage Tourism Terms in the English Language. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION, 1(4), 66–70. Retrieved from http://inter-publishing.com/index.php/IJISE/article/view/170

Saidovna, V. F. (2021). The Functional Essence of Some Pilgrimage Terms in The English Language. Eurasian Research Bulletin, 3, 1-6. https://www.geniusjournals.org/index.php/erb/article/view/259

Gadoeva M.I. Features of connotative meaning of somatisms as part of phraseological units // International Journal on Integrated Education.Volume 3, Issue III, March, 2020. – P.73-78. (Impact Factor: SJIF 2020 – 5,712)

8.Gadoeva M.I. Lexico-semantic fields of “eye” in English and Uzbek languages // Academicia. An International multidisciplinary Research Journal. ISSN (online): 2249-7137. Vol. 11, Issue 10, October. https://saarj.com DOI NUMBER 10.5958/2249-7137.2021.02176.5. -India, 2021. – P.872-879. (Impact Factor: SJIF 2021 - 7.492)

Gadoeva M.I. Semantics of somatism in blessings of English and Uzbek cultures // Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal Open Access, Peer reviewed Journal. ISSN: 2776-0979. Volume 2, Issue 11, November, 2021. – P. 269-276. (Impact Factor: SJIF 2021 – 5,599).

Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., &Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatics transfer in ESL refusals.InR.Scarcella, E. Anderson, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55-73). New York: Newbury House.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress.

Chen, S. (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning in Asian Language Teacher Training. The Proceedings of the Biennial Conference.Asian Studies Association of Australia. La Trobe University, Melbourne.

Hong, W. (2011). Refusals in Chinese: How Do L1 and L2 Differ?: Refusals in Chinese: How Do L1 and L2 Differ? ForeignLanguageAnnals, 44(1), 122–136.

Lakoff, Robin (1975). Language and Woman's Place.NewYork: Harper&Row, Publishers

Maier, Paula (1992). “Politeness Strategies in Busibess Letters by Native and NonnativeEnglish Speakers,” English for SpecificPurposes, 11, 189-205.

Thomas, J., (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure.Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2022-11-01

Как цитировать

Nargisa Sulaymonovna, Q., & Nigina Sharofovna, B. . (2022). INGLIZ VA O’ZBEK TILLARIDA RAD ETISH MUNOSABATLARINING LINVOMADANIY VA KOGNITIV XUSUSIYATLARI. Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке, 1(4), 465–471. извлечено от http://nauchniyimpuls.ru/index.php/noiv/article/view/1393
Loading...