EVALUATE THE SOCIAL FACTORS IMPACTING LANGUAGE VARIATION
Ключевые слова:
ethnicity, occupation, income, examine, lower working, ordinary speech, standart variants, perfect codesАннотация
Variation is a characteristic of language: there are several ways of saying the same sentence. Speakers may differ in pronunciation (pronunciation), word choice (vocabulary), or morphology and syntax (sometimes called "grammar"). Language change is a fundamental concept of sociolinguistics to the extent that it requires reference to social factors. Language varies from one place to another, from one social group and from one situation to another. The fact that speakers of the same language living in different parts of a continuous territory do not speak the same language is a universal characteristic of human language, the speech of each settlement differs from the speech of each neighboring population by some features. It is also clear that social forces contribute to language change. Young people change their speech to distinguish themselves from adults. Islanders want to vote differently from the mainland. Middle-class speakers tend to sound different than working-class speakers, and vice versa. Men and women tend to speak in a way that their gender is "supposed to". After all, sometimes consciously and sometimes unconsciously, people talk like the people they want to think they are; linguistic differentiation is a matter of manifestation in everyday life.
Библиографические ссылки
Abrams, Daniel M. and Strogatz, Steven H.. 2003. Modelling the dynamics of language death. Nature 24: 900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis. 1996. ‘Francophonie’ in the 1990s: Problems and Opportunities. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dennis. 2001. Motivation in Language Planning and Language Policy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dushatova, S. (2022). EVFEMIZM TUSHUNCHASI TAHLILI.
Dushatova, S. (2022). LINGUISTIC AND SOCIAL ORIGINATION OF TABOOS. Science and innovation, 1(B6), 318-321.
qizi Dushatova, S. B., & qizi Qodiraliyeva, N. I. (2022). EFFECTIVE METHODS OF LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGES. International Academic Research Journal Impact Factor 7.4, 1(5), 63-67.
Neville. n.d. Linguistic rights, language planning and democracy in post Apartheid South Africa. In Baker, Steven J. (ed.), Language Policy: Lessons from Global Models. Monterey Institute of International Studies, 116–29.
Margaret. 1982. Diglossia in Greece. In Haas, W. (ed.), Standard Languages, Spoken and Written. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 156–93. Google Scholar
Reginald F. 1994. La situation linguistique au Ghana et les problèmes de standardisation. In Lüdi, Georges (ed.), Sprachstandardisierung, Standardisation des langues, Standardization of Languages. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 23–32. Google Scholar
Rodrigue and Réal Landry. 1992. Ethnolinguistic vitality beliefs and language maintenance and loss. In Fase, W., Jaespaert, K. and Kroon, S. (eds.), Maintenance and Loss of Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 171–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherida. 1987. Language choice in multilingual societies: a Singapore case study. In Knapp, Karlfried, Enninger, Werner and Knapp-Potthoff, Annelie (eds.), Analyzing Intercultural Communication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 75–94. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
