COGNITIVE LINGUISTIC ANALYSES OF THE PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN MODERN LINGUISTICS
Ключевые слова:
cognitive, linguistic, analyses, phraseological, phenomena, modernАннотация
In our research, we set out to show the specifics of the implementation of the sign of constructive conditionality in the field of phraseology, to establish the syntactic constructions necessary for the semantics of phraseological units, characterized by the constructive conditionality of their functioning, to show the determinism of the structure that defines the use of phraseological units in speech, the grammatical structure and the lexical-grammatical composition of verbal complex-prototype of the phraseological unit. Phraseological units that realize their values under the condition of a strictly defined structure are characterized by a sign of constructive conditioning. Such units are widely represented in modern English and, along with other types of phraseological units, are part of the English phraseological foundation. They are not able to independently represent what is indicated by means of the values assigned to them, irrespective of the mandatory actualizing effect on these values from the side of the verbal sign.
Библиографические ссылки
ALEKHINA, A. I. 1982. Idiom of modern English. Minsk: Higher School, 279p.
ALEKSEEVA, L. M. 1998. Term and metaphor. Perm, 250 p. AMOSOVA, H. H. 1965. On the diachronic analysis of phraseological units. In: Studies in English phraseology. L.: Leningradskaja Univerzita., pp.101-107.
ARKHANGELSKY, V. L. 1964. Stable phrases in modern Russian. In: Rostov-onDon, pp.121–137. ARNOLD, I. V. 1999. Semantics. The style. Intertextuality. SPb: SPbSU, 444p.
ARUTYUNOVA, N. D. 1990. Discourse. In: Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. M.: Sov. Encyclopedia, pp. 136-137.
BABUSHKIN, A. P. 1996. Types of concepts in the lexical and phraseological semantics of the language. Voronezh: Voronezh State University. 104p.
BALLY, S. 2001. French style. In: Editorial URSS. 360p.
BLOOMFIELD, L. 1968. Language. In: Progress. 607p.
BUYANOVA, L. YU. – KOVALENKO, E.G. 2004. Russian phraseologism as a mental-cognitive means of linguistic conceptualization of the sphere of moral qualities of a person: Monograph. Krasnodar: KubSU. 166p.
CHERNYSHOVA, T.V. 1999. Usual-style complex as a mechanism for generating an invective statement in the field of newspaper journalism. In: Problems and Prospects:
Interuniversity. Sat scientific tr. / Ed. N.D. Goleva. Barnaul.
KARASIK, V. I. 2000. On the types of discourse. In: Language personality: institutional and personal discourse: Sat. scientific labor. Volgograd: Change, pp. 5-20.
KOPYLENKO, M. M. – POPOVA, Z. D. 1989. Essays on general phraseology (Phrase combinations in the language system). Voronezh: Voronezh State University.190p.
KUBRYAKOVA, E. S. 1997. Cognitive aspects of word formation and related rules of inference (semantic inference). In: New ways to study the word formation of Slavic languages. Magdeburg, pp. 29-39.
KUBRYAKOVA, E. S. 2000. On the concepts of discourse and discursive analysis in modern linguistics. In: Discourse, speech, speech activity: functional and structural aspects. RAS INION, pp.7-22.
KUNIN, A. B. 1984. The internal form of phraseological units. In: Word in grammar and dictionary. Nauka, pp. 183-188.
KABANOVA, E. V. 2011. Conceptualization of temperature in the German language picture of the world: Dis ... cand. filol. sciences. Barnaul. 244p.
LAKOFF, J. – JOHNSON, M. 1990. Metaphors with which we live. In: Theory of metaphor. M.: Progress, pp. 387-415.
LARIN, B. A. 1996. Essays on phraseology (On the systematization and research methods of phraseological materials). In: Modern Russian language: Lexicology. Lexicography: Reader and study assignments. SPb: SPbU, pp. 192-204.
MORRIS, C. W. 1971. Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton. (Contains Morris, 1938, Morris, 1946a, and other essays, as well as the first chapter of Morris, 1964.)
PASTUSHENKO, L. P. 1982. English phraseological units in the phraseo-thematic field (based on the phraseo-thematic field of marinisms): Dis ... cand. filol. sciences. Kiev. 194p.
POLIVANOV, E. D. 1991. Proceedings in Eastern and General Linguistics. Nauka.624p.
POPOVA, Z. D. – STERNIN, I. A. 2007. Basic features of a semantic-cognitive approach to language. In: Anthology of concepts. Gnosis. SERIO, P. 1999. How to read texts in France. In: Squaring the meaning. French school of discourse. Progress, pp.12-53.
SEARLE, J. 1986. Basic concepts of the calculus of speech acts. In: New in foreign linguistics. Logical analysis of natural language. Vol. Xviii. Progress. pp.242-263.
SKLYAREVSKAYA, G. N. 1993. Metaphor in the language system. St. Petersburg: Nauka.152 p.
TELIA, V. N. 2004. Cultural strata in phraseological units and discursive practices. YaSK. 344 p.
TELIA, V. N. 1977. Secondary nomination and its types. In: Language nomination (Types of names). Nauka, pp. 129-221.
TELIA, V. N. 1986. The connotative aspect of the semantics of nominative units. Nauka. 143 p.
VEZHBITSKAYA, A. 1997. Prototypes and invariants. In: Language. The culture. Cognition. Rus. Dictionaries, pp.201-230.
VINOGRADOV, V. V. 1975. Questions of studying phrases (on the material of the Russian language): The main questions of the syntax of the sentence. In: Selected works: research on Russian grammar. Nauka, pp. 56-87.
ZHUKOVA, L. S. 2006. Concept LANGUAGE in the English national consciousness (based on the material of the modern British press). In: Conceptology: research experience: Sat. scientific tr / Novosib. state un-ty Novosibirsk, pp.70-75.
ZVEGINTSEV, V. A. 1976. Sentence and its relation to language and speech. In: Moscow State University. 307p.
