FORMATION OF TERMINOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF NON-PHILOLOGY STUDENTS AS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR IN UNDERSTANDING READING MATERIALS

FORMATION OF TERMINOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF NON-PHILOLOGY STUDENTS AS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR IN UNDERSTANDING READING MATERIALS

Authors

  • Kurbanova Husniya Phd student at Gulistan State University 120100, Gagarin street,Gulistan, Sirdarya, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

non-philological direction, term, ESP, GMAT, GRE, SAT, B2, professional lexicon, vocabulary, term groups

Abstract

Students need English not only in the process of university education, but their future careers are inextricably linked with this language. In order to carry out high-quality professional activities in the process of international exchange, graduates of a non-philological higher educational institution should have the opportunity to carry out field activities in a foreign language environment. Informal feedback from students also supports their position that they need formal instruction in foreign language learning to be successful in their future careers or careers. At the same time, after graduation, students can pursue master's and Ph.D. must know English at the lower or upper B2 level. They are required to pass the international GMAT, SAT, GRE exams for their work and academic career in general secondary schools in our republic. Also, in the era of developing the STEAM approach in education, future professionals need to have knowledge of English reading, writing, speaking and professional lexicon in order to become a suitable staff for these requirements. Below, we will consider the importance of terminology, terms and their types, and the importance of professional lexicon in foreign language learning. Most people agree that teaching technical vocabulary should not fall under the purview of the ESP teacher. However, there are times when ESP teachers have to make sure that the students understand the technical terms that are used in a text or in an exercise. It will be simpler for teachers to select the best teaching strategies for each student the more familiar they are with their classrooms.

References

Baker, M. (1988). Sub-technical vocabulary and the ESP teacher: An analysis of some rhetorical items in medical journal articles. Reading in a foreign language, 4 (2), 91-105.

Dudley-Evans, T., St John, M. J. (2007). Developments in ESP. A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Ibbotson, M. (2009). Professional English in use. Technical English for engineering. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford, UK: Blackwell publishing

Morgan, J., Rinvolucri, M. (2004). Vocabulary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Richards, J. C., Renandya, W.A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (3rd edition). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.

Schmitt, N., McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Strevens, P. (1972). Technical, technological and scientific English. ELT Journal 27, 223-234p.

Thornbury, S. (2007). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow, Pearson Education Limited.

Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Kurtán, Zs. 2003. Szakmai nyelvhasználat [Professional Language Use]. Budapest:

Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

Kurbanova Husniya. (2024). FORMATION OF TERMINOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF NON-PHILOLOGY STUDENTS AS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR IN UNDERSTANDING READING MATERIALS. Scientific Impulse, 2(22), 49–57. Retrieved from http://nauchniyimpuls.ru/index.php/ni/article/view/16885
Loading...