THE RELATIONSHIP OF PHASE WITH COMPONENTS OF ASPECTUALITY

THE RELATIONSHIP OF PHASE WITH COMPONENTS OF ASPECTUALITY

Authors

  • Tuychiyeva Navbahor Ruzimurot kizi Samarkand state institute of foreign languages 2nd year student of the master degree
  • Latipov Aziz Akbaraliyevich Samarkand State Institute of foreign languages Teacher of English language

Keywords:

phase, relationship, components, aspectuality, phase meanings

Abstract

In languages there are grammatical indicators with phase meaning (grammatical category species), there are such as language units that convey phase meanings, but at the same time, as a rule, retain syntactic features full-valued lexemes. The latter fact makes a number of researchers consider linguistic units of this type as lexemes that have independent lexical meaning. This means that linguistic means with a phase value occupy a special, intermediate position between vocabulary and grammar.

References

Averina A. V. Categorical values of the phase field and language means of its expression: on the material of Russian and German languages: diss. k. philol. n. M., 2004. p 197.

Averina, A.V. Categorical values of the phase field and linguistic means of its expression / http://diss lib.ru - mode access: http://disslib.ru /catalog/ 170 /41871

Belov V.I. Eves – M: Sovremennik, 1976. – p 333.

Bloch M.Y. English grammar. M., 2006. p 48.

Bondarko A. V., Bulanin L. L. Russian verb. L.: Education, 1967. 326 p.

Bondarko A.V. Phase values and their characteristics//Functional grammar. L., 1985. p.159.

Butler Ch. S. Structure and Function. A Guide to Three Major Structural Functional Theories: in 3 Part. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003. Part 1. p 552

Bystrov I.S. Phasic verbs in English//Typology with predicate actants. M., 1985. p.75.

Krakovsky V.S. Phase.//Theory of functional grammar. L., 1985.p.79.

Krakovsky V.S. The theory of functional grammar. Introduction. Aspectuality, temporal localization, taxis - L.: Nauka, 1987. – p 348.

Konovalov Y. G. Ways of expressing the phase nature of an action in modern Russian: author. diss... k. philol . n. M., 1983. p 18.

Maslov Y.S. On the foundations of comparative aspectology. L., 1978.

RizaevB.Kh. Аналитические средства семантического поля финитивности в современном немецком языке. - Самарканд. 2019.

Salaznikova L.V. Initiativity as functional semantic category in Russian / Saratov, 1981. – p 18.

Sokolov O.M. Phase variation in species oppositions Russian verbs// Philological Sciences. - 1985. - No. 4. - p 46-52.

Alimov, S. S., & Yusupova, O. M. (2022). LINGUOCULTURAL FEATURES OF BORROWINGS FROM ENGLISH TO UZBEK LANGUAGE. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(1), 1-4.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-10

How to Cite

Tuychiyeva Navbahor Ruzimurot kizi, & Latipov Aziz Akbaraliyevich. (2023). THE RELATIONSHIP OF PHASE WITH COMPONENTS OF ASPECTUALITY. Education News: Exploring the 21st Century, 1(10), 333–337. Retrieved from http://nauchniyimpuls.ru/index.php/noiv/article/view/8613
Loading...