COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CASE CATEGORY IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
Keywords:
Case category, English grammar, Uzbek grammar, analytic languages, synthetic languages, case marking, typological categories, case theory.Abstract
This article provides to better understand the two languages that reflect the two different typological categories—analytic and synthetic—this research compares the case categories in English and Uzbek. A sophisticated system of suffixes linked directly to nouns and pronouns is used in Uzbek to communicate, whereas English mostly uses word order and prepositions to signal grammatical relationships. This different take on case marking draws attention to the various ways in which languages communicate grammatical information and clarifies the effects of typological variations on language learning and communication. As a grammatical category that designates a noun phrase's function within a sentence, case is defined as follows in the study's theoretical framework: Languages differ in their use of case systems: some, like English, have a very simple system that depends only on word order and prepositions, while others, like Uzbek, have a more complex system that uses a range of suffixes. Understanding how languages encode grammatical relationships and the function of case in the linguistic system as a whole is made more difficult and interesting by the variance in case marking systems.
References
Blake, Barry J. Case. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 – 147 p.
Comrie Bernard Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981 – 220 p.
Dixon R. M. Basic Linguistic Theory Further Grammatical Topics. – Oxford: University Press, 2000 – 427 p.
Haspelmath Martin The World Atlas of Language Structures. – Britain: Oxford University Press, 2013 – 231p.
Jakobson R. Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957 – 287 p.
Payne T. Understanding Grammar. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. – 272 p.
Nichols Johanna Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. – London: Language Press, 1986 – 421 p.
Yakobjanov, J. J. (2024). QO ‘QON XONLIGI TA’LIM TIZIMI TARIXSHUNOSLIGI (MUSTAQILLIK DAVRI TARIXSHUNOSLIGI MISOLIDA). O'ZBEKISTONDA FANLARARO INNOVATSIYALAR VA ILMIY TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI, 3(30), 50-53.
Yakobjanov, J. (2023). FROM THE HISTORY OF MILITARY AFFAIRS IN UBEK STATEHOOD (AS AN EXAMPLE OF BUKHARA EMIRATE). Modern Science and Research, 2(10), 1209-1212.
Якобжанов, Ж. Ж. (2023). ҚЎҚОНХОНЛИГИНИНГТАРИХШУНОСЛИГИНИНГАЙРИМЖИҲАТЛАРИ (1991-2023 ЙЙ.). INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENTS AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 2(22), 149-153.
Yakobjanov, J. J. (2023, June). SOME ISSUES OF HISTORY OF KHIVA AND KOKAN KHANATES (ANALYSIS OF MODERN UZBEK RESEARCH). In INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CONFERENCE (Vol. 2, No. 15, pp. 252-254).
Якобжанов, Ж. Ж. (2023). МУСТАҚИЛЛИК ЙИЛЛАРИДА ҚЎҚОН ХОНЛИГИ ТАЪЛИМ ТИЗИМИНИНГ ЁРИТИЛИШИ. Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке, 1(6), 839-842.
Yakobjanov, J. J. (2019). Russian-Kokand relations in the early 19th century (By the example of Philip Nazarov Embassy period). Proceedings of The ICECRS, 3.
Yakobjanov, J. J. (2019). THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SOURCES AVAILABLE IN THE DAYS OF AUTONOMY IN THE LEARNING OF KOKAND KHANATE. Theoretical & Applied Science, (11), 605-607.
