“INCREASING THE LEVEL OF CREATIVE THINKING OF STUDENTS IN PRACTICAL CLASSES IN PHYSICS”
Ключевые слова:
Creative thinking, practical classes, physics education, innovation, problem-solving, hands-on experiments, pedagogical methods.Аннотация
This scientific article explores the strategies and approaches to enhance creative thinking among students during practical physics classes. Creative thinking is a vital skill in the modern world, promoting innovation and problem-solving. Practical physics classes provide a unique opportunity to foster creativity by engaging students in hands-on experiments, critical analysis, and open-ended problem-solving. This article reviews pedagogical methods and instructional techniques that can be employed to elevate the creative thinking abilities of students in the context of physics education. It emphasizes the role of practical physics classes in not only deepening conceptual understanding but also in nurturing creative thinking, which is essential for addressing the complex challenges of the 21st century.
Библиографические ссылки
lonzo, A., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2019). Unpacking the complexity of science teachers' PCK in action: Enacted and personal PCK. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski(Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp. 93–116). Singapore: Springer.
Carlson, J., & Daehler, K. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski(Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp. 93–116). Singapore: Springer.
Cauet, E., Liepertz, S., Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2015). Does it matter what we measure? Domain-specific professional knowledge of physics teachers. Revue Suisse des Sciences de l'Education, 37(3), 462–479.
Ergöneç, J., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. (2014). The impact of pedagogical content knowledge on cognitive activa- tion and student learning. In H. E. Fischer, P. Labudde, K. Neumann, & J. Viiri (Eds.), Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland (pp. 145–160). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Fischer, H., Neumann, K., Labudde, P., & Viiri, J. (Eds.). (2014b). Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland. M€unster, Germany: Waxmann.
Kulgemeyer, C., & Riese, J. (2018). From professional knowledge to professional performance: The impact of CK and PCK on teaching quality in explaining situations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1393–1418.
Milner-Bolotin, M. (2018). Evidence-Based Research in STEM Teacher Education: From Theory to Practice. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00092
Nordine, J., Sorge, S., Delen, I., Evans, R., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Nilsson, P., Ropohl, M., & Stadler, M. (2021). Promoting Coherent Science Instruction through Coherent Science Teacher Education: A Model Framework for Program Design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1902631
