“ENHANCING PHYSICS EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE EFFICACY OF INTERACTIVE TEACHING METHODS”
Ключевые слова:
Interactive teaching, physics education, peer instruction, flipped classrooms, hands-on experiments, student engagement, active learning, teaching methodologies.Аннотация
This scientific article explores the potential of interactive teaching methods in enhancing the understanding and engagement of students in the field of physics. Traditional didactic approaches to teaching physics have been widely criticized for their limitations in promoting deep comprehension and student motivation. In response to these challenges, this article delves into the advantages and methodologies of interactive teaching techniques, such as peer instruction, flipped classrooms, and hands-on experiments. By discussing recent research findings and case studies, we demonstrate the positive impact of interactive methods on student learning outcomes and provide insights for educators and institutions seeking to modernize their physics education strategies.
Библиографические ссылки
lonzo, A., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2019). Unpacking the complexity of science teachers' PCK in action: Enacted and personal PCK. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski(Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp. 93–116). Singapore: Springer.
Carlson, J., & Daehler, K. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski(Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp. 93–116). Singapore: Springer.
Cauet, E., Liepertz, S., Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2015). Does it matter what we measure? Domain-specific professional knowledge of physics teachers. Revue Suisse des Sciences de l'Education, 37(3), 462–479.
Ergöneç, J., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. (2014). The impact of pedagogical content knowledge on cognitive activa- tion and student learning. In H. E. Fischer, P. Labudde, K. Neumann, & J. Viiri (Eds.), Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland (pp. 145–160). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Fischer, H., Neumann, K., Labudde, P., & Viiri, J. (Eds.). (2014b). Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland. M€unster, Germany: Waxmann.
Kulgemeyer, C., & Riese, J. (2018). From professional knowledge to professional performance: The impact of CK and PCK on teaching quality in explaining situations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1393–1418.
Milner-Bolotin, M. (2018). Evidence-Based Research in STEM Teacher Education: From Theory to Practice. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00092
Nordine, J., Sorge, S., Delen, I., Evans, R., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Nilsson, P., Ropohl, M., & Stadler, M. (2021). Promoting Coherent Science Instruction through Coherent Science Teacher Education: A Model Framework for Program Design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.190263
